首页> 外文OA文献 >Possible Futures for the Legal Treatise in an Environment of Wikis, Blogs, and Myriad Online Primary Law Sources
【2h】

Possible Futures for the Legal Treatise in an Environment of Wikis, Blogs, and Myriad Online Primary Law Sources

机译:Wiki,博客和无数在线基本法来源环境下法律论文的可能未来

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Major law publishers have begun producing ebook versions of some of the legal treatises they own. Despite asserted advantages over both print and online versions of the same content, these represent a step back from what treatises have become within the major online services and even further from what they might become now that numerous sources of primary law are directly accessible via the Internet.The article traces the corporate and technological developments that have placed existing treatises in their present posture. Drawing upon the author’s own work preparing a legal treatise designed for digital rather print delivery, it reviews a range of possible futures for this classic form of legal scholarship.The article argues (1) that electronic treatises that have been cut loose from print norms can offer major advantages in format and function over print treatises that have simply been ported to Westlaw, Lexis, or one of their competitors and (2) that strong reasons exist for treatise authors and those with a stake in their work to prefer publication on the open Web to inclusion in one of the large proprietary systems. It concludes with a description of Web-based utilities that might enable such treatises to be competitive with those held in the major online systems and with speculation about the institutional arrangements that might enable treatise-like works delivered in electronic format to survive and even thrive without being confined to a single comprehensive database.
机译:主要的法律出版商已经开始生产他们拥有的某些法律论文的电子书版本。尽管相对于相同内容的印刷版和在线版都具有优势,但这些代表相对于主要在线服务中已发表的论文有所退步,甚至与现在可以通过互联网直接访问大量基本法的内容相比,它们可能会进一步退步。这篇文章追溯了公司和技术的发展,这些发展使现有论文处于目前的状态。借鉴作者自己的工作,准备了专为数字交付而不是印刷交付而设计的法律论文,它回顾了这种经典形式的法律学术形式的一系列可能的未来。文章认为(1)从印刷规范中删除的电子论文可以与仅移植到Westlaw,Lexis或其竞争对手之一的印刷论文相比,在格式和功能上提供了主要优势,并且(2)有充分的理由使论文作者和与他们有利益关系的人偏爱公开发表Web包含在大型专有系统之一中。最后以基于Web的实用程序的描述为基础,这些实用程序可使这些论文与主要在线系统中的论文具有竞争力,并推测其制度安排可能使以电子格式交付的类似论文的作品得以生存甚至繁荣。被限制在一个单一的综合数据库中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Martin, Peter W.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号